Sociology Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words

Sociology - Term Paper ExampleSocial events vary in a wide range, due to the variations in humankind tendency and behavior. Analyzing the reason behind social events requires a psychological study of human behavior, as that strongly holds the ethics of religious, cultural and community values as its background. Matthew Desmond in his book analyzed the subjective facts of individual psychology of temptation and risk bearing factors. Fighting against the wood fire is a life pickings job but the country boys, in their every efforts, tries to prove their braveness by accomplishing the challenging job. Every forest fires are followed by death, injuries and bone breaks but they never go bad up fighting against it (Desmond). Hence, the factor behind the human guts must be very personal the responsibility they feel about rescuing forest from fire, to maintain their identity as a firefighter and also the inability to do the same would be a question to their masculinity. All the mentioned f actors seem to throw away their connection with the psychological prospects of an individual with his ethical values. Psychological factors are equally responsible for the intricacy of individual in any social events. On this black eye Randall collins, emphasizing on micro-sociological theory, gives stress on social violence as a result of the big shape of emotions in an individual, connected to several quondam(prenominal) and present happening in his/her life. For example poverty, race, and origins in divorce or single parent families etc. Human psychological condition of fear, insecurity and inferiority leads to the violence of different kinds. For example mass murder, serial killing, revenge taking, sexual abuse and suicide. He insists on the use of the modern technology to give credential to the findings. As per Collins, police normally uses the available data to confine the cause of the happening. But such empirical data are not liable to give psychological justification to the case. The use of micro analysis theory becomes a necessity, in such cases, as that can draw out the emotional involvement of the individual in a particular social event (Collins). As these two frameworks, seem to have the similarities with the Comtes social theory of positivism and anti-positivism. Where, Collins views inclines more towards anti-positivists whereas Desmond towards positivists. Giving stress to positivism, Durkheim maintained that the social sciences are a logical continuation of the natural ones into the realm of human activity, and insisted that they should retain the same objectivity, rationalism, and onward motion to causality. This approach eschews epistemological and metaphysical concerns such as the nature of social facts, in favor of methodological debates concerning clarity, reliability and validity (Wacquant ). Supporting anti-positivism, sociologist Max weber argued that sociology may be loosely described as a science as it is able to identify caus al relationships of human social action, oddly among ideal types, or hypothetical simplifications of complex social phenomena. Karl Marxs methodology is borrowed from Hegelian dialecticism but also a rejection of positivism in favor of critical analysis, quest to supplement the empirical acquisition of facts with the elimination of illusions. He maintained that appearances need to be critiqued rather than simply documented